I tried to use https://epel.repo.almalinux.org/10.1/x86_64_v2/Packages/ndppd-0.2.6-1.el10_1.alma_altarch.x86_64_v2.rpm on AlmaLinux 10.1 x86_64_v2.
The CPU is Core i3-2120.
This ndppd runs with no errors, but do nothing.
Then I rebuilt ndppd-0.2.5-6.el9.src.rpm, the older version from epel9.
This older version functions properly with the same ndppd.conf on the same system.
All other conditions are also same.
Hi,
when you say you rebuilt ndppd-0.2.5-6.el9.src.rpm, did you build it with mock for AlmaLinux 10 x86_64_v2, or just with rpmbuild on the running system?
If a mock-built 0.2.5 works but the repo 0.2.6 doesn’t, it may be a packaging issue in the 0.2.6 build.
thanks
I rebuilt them on the x86_64_v2 running system.
Rebuilt 0.2.5 –> works well
Rebuilt 0.2.6 –> does not work
Distributed 0.2.6 –> does not work
Thanks for the details.
So even a locally rebuilt 0.2.6 shows the same behaviour, while 0.2.5 works with the same config.
That sounds more like a change/regression in ndppd itself than an issue specific to the AlmaLinux x86_64_v2 build.
To narrow it down, could you:
- Run 0.2.6 in the foreground with debug enabled and paste the output?
ndppd -d -v -c /etc/ndppd.conf
- Share a redacted version of your
ndppd.conf. - Describe a bit more concretely what “does not work” means
(for example: no NDP replies, no routes added, no log messages, etc.).
thanks